Unclear agent identity
When an action reaches a system, you need to know which agent made the request, who owns it, and what it was meant to do. Without that, an agent is just another anonymous API caller.
Most teams can't answer that. BastionShield makes sure you can.
BastionShield Bulwark is the identity, access control, audit logging, and compliance layer for every AI agent in your organisation. It takes days to deploy and works with your existing stack.
As agents gain the ability to act across your tools and APIs, four gaps tend to open up. Not every organisation has all of them, but most putting agents into production recognise at least one.
When an action reaches a system, you need to know which agent made the request, who owns it, and what it was meant to do. Without that, an agent is just another anonymous API caller.
An agent wired up for one job quietly accumulates access to tools and actions beyond its remit. Nobody set out to over-permission it; it happened one integration at a time.
When something goes wrong, teams struggle to reconstruct which actions an agent attempted, which policy applied, and what the outcome was. The evidence was never captured.
Some operations should not proceed on an agent’s say-so alone. Without a defined point for review or escalation, the model decides, and you find out afterwards.
BastionShield sits between your organisation and its AI agents as the identity system, permission engine, audit trail, and compliance record, all in one platform. This is not an AI automation product. It is the infrastructure that governs them.
Every AI agent deployed inside your organisation receives a cryptographically signed identity, a persistent record that defines who the agent is, what it was created to do, and who owns it.
Book a demoHover to pause
Five integrated layers that together form the complete governance stack for AI agents.
Every layer connects to the next. Identity informs access. Access shapes audit. Audit feeds compliance. Built to operate continuously, not just at audit time.
SaaS companies deploying AI copilots inside customer environments have no way to audit agent actions or demonstrate compliance to enterprise buyers. This is now a sales blocker.
Solution: BastionShield provides the audit trail and compliance evidence that unlocks enterprise sales.
Large organisations running internal automation agents across HR, finance, and operations cannot track what data those agents accessed or what decisions they influenced.
Solution: Centralised identity registry and activity log for every internal AI agent.
Financial services firms face DORA, FCA AI guidance, and incoming UK AI legislation, with no tooling built to generate the required evidence for AI system oversight.
Solution: Per-agent decision records, access history and risk events, exportable as the evidence your own regulator or auditor asks for.
Healthcare AI workflows touching patient records require complete audit trails and access restriction, requirements that general AI platforms cannot meet.
Solution: GDPR Article 30 processing records and access control for healthcare AI agents.
Governance projects fail when they start by blocking production traffic. Bulwark is designed to record first, so you tune against real behaviour rather than guesses, and enforce only once the denials make sense.
Drop in our SDK. One line of code per agent. Python, TypeScript, or REST API.
Monitor mode records every agent action and blocks nothing. You get a real inventory, including the agents nobody registered.
Derive scopes from traffic you actually recorded, then turn on the gate for consequential actions and route the irreversible ones to a human.
Every decision lands on a hash-chained trail with a standalone verifier, so an auditor can check it without running our software.
from bulwark import BulwarkClient
bw = BulwarkClient(api_key="bw_live_...")
# Monitor mode: records, never blocks
bw.observe("agt_123", "crm.read", resource="customers")
# Enforcement: returns allow / deny / escalate
verdict = bw.decide("agt_123", "crm.write", resource="customers")curl -X POST https://api.bastionshieldtechnologies.com/v1/decide \
-H "Authorization: Bearer bw_live_..." \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"agentId": "agt_123",
"actionType": "crm.write",
"resource": "customers"
}'
# -> { "decision": "allow" | "deny" | "escalate", ... }Bulwark records that an action happened. It does not record the contents of that action. Content is stripped before anything is written to disk, so the data your agents handle never reaches our storage in the first place.
Anything that looks like a card number, email address, national insurance or social security number, bank account, phone number or access token is masked as well, wherever it appears.
This is what an auditor asks for. None of it requires knowing what the data said.
Every stored record carries a marker showing what was removed from it and how large the original was. You can prove minimization happened without ever having trusted us with the content, which is a stronger position than a policy document, because it survives the question “how would we know?”
A log says an action happened. A decision receipt records the agent, the human it acted for, the policy applied, who held authority to approve and what they decided, linked into a hash chain so any later edit is detectable.
sha256:9f2c4b…a71e · prev:4d81ff…02bcThe governance principles Bulwark is built around, stated plainly. We describe what the product does, not a framework we claim to be certified against.
An agent’s allowed tools are declared up front, and actions outside that scope are flagged rather than assumed safe.
Selected actions route to a person for approval, with the context needed to make the call, and the outcome is recorded.
Prompts, completions and other free-text content are stripped at ingest. Bulwark governs the fact of an action, not the conversation behind it.
The evidence chain is hash-linked with HMAC-SHA256 and exportable, and a standalone verifier checks its integrity with no secret required for linkage.
Bulwark can support your governance process and produce evidence for it. It does not make your organisation compliant with any framework, and we do not claim certifications we do not hold.
A security and governance layer for AI agents. It gives each agent an identity and a declared scope, evaluates the actions an agent takes against your policy, and keeps a tamper-evident record of the decisions. Version 1 observes and records; it does not block.
No. Bulwark evaluates an action and returns a decision; your own code acts on it. Because it is out of the execution path, it cannot add latency to, stall, or break your agent, and it never needs to see the content of a prompt or a completion.
Metadata about decisions and events. Prompt and completion content, message bodies and other free-text content fields are stripped at ingest before anything is written, and each stored record marks what was removed.
Decisions and relevant events are appended to a hash-linked chain using HMAC-SHA256. You can export the evidence bundle and check its integrity yourself with a standalone, zero-dependency verifier, so the record does not rest on trusting us.
No. It complements them. Bulwark governs what your agents are permitted to do and records it; it does not replace your IdP, your secrets management or the access controls on the underlying systems.
Bulwark is sales-led. Book a demo and we will walk through how it maps to your agents, your tools and the evidence your own reviewers ask for.
Make the right decisions before they become expensive mistakes.
Book a demo to see Bulwark on your stack, or a deeper architectural review with our team. No commitment, and we work with what you already run.